![]() Diefenderfer: The Financial Hit Man of Student Loans” ![]() Why a Sovereign State Bank Is Good for Tennessee Website: Solari Report – Actionable Intelligence to Live a Free & Inspired LifeĬatherine Austin Fitts reading recommendations:īy Catherine Austin Fitts and Carolyn Betts This is banking made interesting - and yes, ghastly. This is not simply an abstract analysis, but also a nitty-gritty factual examination of topics ranging from how the global banks supported Hitler before and throughout his murderous rampage in World War II to how our federal government entrapped unwary young people into crushing student loans that fed the universities and the elite while entrapping the victims of these predatory loans for much of their lives. Today’s discussion between Peter and Ginger Breggin and Catherine Austin Fitts may well be the most straightforward and enlightening discussion of international banking as the crux of globalism and human evil itself that you may ever hear. That’s because none of those machinations make sense except as methods for the elite to protect and expand their wealth and power at the expense of the billions of other people who inhabit this Earth. Only to the extent that you can accept that people, nearly every last one of them, become eviler as they become powerful ⏤ will you be able to grasp some of the intricacies of global banking. Global banking is the cog in the wheel of vast human evil - the absorbing and redistributing of human energy from all of humanity to the elites. And today, Ginger and I interview our friend and colleague in the fight for global freedom, former investment banker and government financial expert, Catherine Austin Fitts.ĭuring the exchange, I more fully realized the roots to which we must return to understanding global banking and globalism itself. I have been deeply immersed in trying to understand the global banking system for several years - reading books, interviewing experts, and straining my brain to its breaking point. Unless you're working in a highly technical context or enjoy linguistic trivia, I wouldn't worry.Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed I couldn't have told you the exact difference between a sprocket, a cog, and a cogwheel without looking it up. The OED uses the hyphen Merriam-Webster omits it.įinally, people mix these uses all the time. a train of gears: a set of such wheelsĬogwheel is virtually identical to cog-wheel. Wheels working one upon another, by means of teeth, or otherwise. Gear or gearwheel: cog-wheels that work upon each other (OED, " gear, n."):ī. A wheel equipped with projections along its rim that are used to engage with the links of a chain, the perforations along the edge of a strip of film, etc. Sprocket: A term for a kind of cog-wheel that meshes with a chain note that some cog-wheels work with other toothed parts like belts or other cog-wheels (OED, " sprocket, n."):ī. 54 The great Roller in the middle is surrounded with a Cog. Here are a few for cogwheel:Ĭog: Yes, by the 18th century some English users had shortened cogwheel to cog and used that to refer to the entire wheel apparatus. Languages often generate synonyms or hyponyms (more specific words) for the same item. Now, you've posited several other options for what these items may be called. The OED again, " cog-wheel, n.":Ī wheel with cogs, used to transmit motion more generally, a toothed wheel which engages with another similar wheel, or with a toothed bar or rack a gear-wheel. One of a series of teeth or similar projections on the circumference of a wheel, or the side of a bar, etc., which, by engaging with corresponding projections on another wheel, etc., transmit or receive motion.Ī wheel with cogs would be more specifically called a cog-wheel. Here is the first definition in " cog, n. They also exist as very flat and small versions in mechanical watches.Ĭog traditionally referred to the individual teeth on the cogwheel. I assume that there are still large, industrial machines that use these, but I primarily associate them with the 1800s and first half of the 1900s. I don't know if these are considered distinct objects or all the same. Sometimes, they seem to not have teeth but instead a belt. The one I imagine is like a metallic "circle" (although usually not very flat) with "teeth" around it, made to hook into another such object for the purpose of doing some kind of mechanical work in an efficient and predictable manner. As a non-native English speaker, one of the most recurring confusions I've had, and which I can't seem to ever get straight, is how to refer to those mechanical "thingies" you often see in old machines and in cartoon depictions of machines.Īre they "cogs", "wheels", "cogwheels", "cog wheels", "sprockets", or something different entirely? I suspect that there are multiple synonyms in English and also that there are different variations of the same basic idea, given different words, which is probably what confuses me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |